Direct answer
HIP-4 is Hyperliquid's outcome-market framework. Instead of a perpetual contract with funding and liquidation mechanics, an outcome market is built around a defined event or condition and a bounded payoff. It can resemble a prediction market in search results, but the contract rules, settlement source, collateral, and venue access decide the actual risk.
What makes outcomes different
- The payoff is bounded by the contract terms.
- There is usually a defined expiry or settlement event.
- The market price can be read as an implied probability only after considering fees, spreads, and settlement risk.
- There is no simple one-to-one mapping between outcome markets and vanilla options.
Outcome market data
This uses public Hyperliquid outcome data and available side prices. Treat implied probability as market-price context, not a forecast or trade recommendation. Recent-change context appears only when enough saved price history exists for the same side.
Probability-change context is using 14400 saved outcome price records. Newest saved price: 2026-08-07T04:17:37.227Z.
16 currently priced outcome sides matched saved history across 531 price times. Largest absolute move: Recurring Yes -0.5 pts. This is descriptive price history, not a forecast.
Implied probability from saved mid prices across 531 capture times over 640.0 hours. Descriptive stored price history, not a forecast.
Recurring
Yes and No mids sum to 100.0%, so the displayed probabilities are internally close.
Yes moved from 0.5% to 0.1% since 2026-08-07T04:17:37.227Z.
Recurring
Yes and No mids sum to 100.0%, so the displayed probabilities are internally close.
Yes moved from 2.0% to 2.0% since 2026-08-07T04:17:37.227Z.
Recurring
Yes and No mids sum to 100.0%, so the displayed probabilities are internally close.
Yes moved from 1.3% to 0.8% since 2026-08-07T04:17:37.227Z.
Recurring
Yes and No mids sum to 100.0%, so the displayed probabilities are internally close.
Yes moved from 1.0% to 1.1% since 2026-08-07T04:17:37.227Z.
Recurring Fallback
Yes and No mids sum to 100.0%, so the displayed probabilities are internally close.
Yes moved from 50.0% to 50.0% since 2026-08-07T04:17:37.227Z.
Recurring Named Outcome
Yes and No mids sum to 100.0%, so the displayed probabilities are internally close.
Yes moved from 1.4% to 1.3% since 2026-08-07T04:17:37.227Z.
Recurring Named Outcome
Yes and No mids sum to 100.0%, so the displayed probabilities are internally close.
Yes moved from 69.9% to 69.9% since 2026-08-07T04:17:37.227Z.
Recurring Named Outcome
Yes and No mids sum to 100.0%, so the displayed probabilities are internally close.
Yes moved from 4.0% to 4.0% since 2026-08-07T04:17:37.227Z.
Related tools
Sources
- Hyperliquid Docs: Info endpointAccessed 2026-05-04Supports: Public info endpoint families used for market, book, candle, account, and portfolio tooling.
- Hyperliquid Docs: Contract specificationsAccessed 2026-05-30Supports: Perpetual contract units, USDC margining, margin fractions, funding versus expiration, and order value limits.
- QuickNode Docs: Hyperliquid outcome market metadataAccessed 2026-05-30Supports: Hyperliquid outcome metadata endpoint shape and technical interpretation boundaries.
- Hyperliquid Docs: RisksAccessed 2026-05-30Supports: Smart contract, L1, market liquidity, oracle manipulation, and open-interest cap risk framing.